| Reader Comment | Sun Jun 03, 2007 4:37 am |
| Finally an amendment that makes real sense; we can NOT trust those that are running things now to do what is in the public's best interest. This amendment would move Florida back toward a true democracy instead of teh lobbyist-run plutocarcy that we have today. No matter how many developers line commisioners pockets, no matter how people like Whitehead get elected in their districts, no matter how people like Touart get hired, we can regain control of at least some aspects of our lives. | |
| Posted by: MSILVA | |
| Sign Petition | Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:53 am |
| The pnj reporter "forgot" to include the
website where we can get a petition to sign! Good job, again, pnj.
www.floridahometowndemocracy.com |
|
| Posted by: PBphotog | |
| COMP PLAN | Sun Jun 03, 2007 2:09 pm |
To MSILVA and Pbphotog – Have either of you ever read a county’s (any county’s) Comprehensive Plan? Do you feel that you are competent to interpret a Comprehensive Plan? Do either of you own property? How would you like it if you had to get the majority of your county’s voter’s approval anytime you wanted to build on or to renovate your property? |
|
| Posted by: Xochitl | |
| Give it back to the people, it will be ok | Sun Jun 03, 2007 4:37 pm |
| Occam's razor...
This is often paraphrased as "All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the best one." In other words, when multiple competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest hypothetical entities. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood. Point is, common folks can usually see through the BS. |
|
| Posted by: omgwhatnow | |
| Reader Comment | Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:15 pm |
| Yes, I own property, yes, I have read through this (and other) county's comprehensive plans, and yes, I'm sure as hell as competent as Whitehead, Young, et al. | |
| Posted by: MSILVA | |
| COMP PLAN | Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:56 pm |